An introduction to p-adic L-functions — Lean blueprint

12.1. Structure theory for Lambda-modules🔗

There is a rich structure theory for modules over Iwasawa algebras, closely mirroring the theory of modules over a PID. We state the basic results without proof.

Definition12.1.1
uses 0used by 1XL∃∀N

Let M, M' be two \Lam-modules. We say M is pseudo-isomorphic to M', written M \sim M', if there is a homomorphism M \to M' with finite kernel and cokernel, equivalently an exact sequence 0 \to A \to M \to M' \to B \to 0 with A and B finite (i.e. of finite cardinality). The relation \sim is not symmetric in general, but it is an equivalence relation on the class of finitely generated torsion \Lam-modules.

Definition12.1.2
uses 0used by 1XL∃∀N

A polynomial P(T) \in \cO_L[T] is distinguished if it is monic of the form P(T) = T^n + a_{n-1}T^{n-1} + \cdots + a_1 T + a_0 with every a_i \in \mathfrak{p} for 0 \le i \le n-1.

Theorem12.1.3
Statement uses 2
Statement dependency previews
Preview
Definition 12.1.1
Loading preview
Statement dependency preview content is loaded from the Blueprint HTML cache.
Used by 2
Reverse dependency previews
Preview
Theorem 13.2.2
Loading preview
Reverse dependency preview content is loaded from the Blueprint HTML cache.
XL∃∀N

Let M be a finitely generated \Lam-module. Then M is pseudo-isomorphic to a direct sum M \sim \Lam^r \oplus \Big( \bigoplus_{i=1}^s \Lam/(p^{n_i}) \Big) \oplus \Big( \bigoplus_{j=1}^t \Lam/(f_j(T)^{m_j}) \Big), for some integers r,s,t \ge 0, exponents n_i, m_j \ge 1, and irreducible distinguished polynomials f_j(T) \in \cO_L[T]. This rests on Definition 12.1.1 and Definition 12.1.2.

Proof for Theorem 12.1.3
uses 0

This is the structure theorem of Washington (1997). The Iwasawa algebra \Lam \cong \cO_L[[T]] is a complete regular local ring of Krull dimension 2 which, while not a PID, is a unique factorisation domain whose height-one primes are (p) and the ideals (f) generated by irreducible distinguished polynomials (by the Weierstrass preparation theorem every nonzero element is, up to a unit, p^\mu times a distinguished polynomial). Localising M at each height-one prime reduces to the principal-ideal situation, and patching the resulting elementary divisors over all height-one primes yields the displayed pseudo-isomorphism; the discrepancy supported at the maximal ideal is exactly the finite kernel and cokernel allowed by \sim.

It is essential that this holds only for the projective limit \Lam, and not for the finite-level group algebras \cO_L[\Zp/p^n\Zp]. This is a recurring theme of Iwasawa theory: one studies the whole tower of objects at once rather than each finite layer individually.

Let M be a finitely generated torsion \Lam-module, so that r = 0 in the structure theorem Theorem 12.1.3. The characteristic ideal of M is \Ch_{\Lam}(M) = (p^{n}) \prod_{j=1}^t (f_j^{m_j}) \subseteq \Lam, \qquad n = \sum_{i=1}^s n_i. Equivalently, \Ch_\Lam(M) is the principal ideal generated by a generator of the product of the height-one elementary divisors.

We will apply this theory in a slightly more general setting. Suppose \GG = H \times \Gamma', where H is a finite commutative group of order prime to p and \Gamma' \cong \Zp; the key example is \GG = \Zpx, H = \mu_{p-1}, \Gamma' = 1 + p\Zp. Then \Lam(\GG) \cong \cO_L[H] \otimes_{\cO_L} \Lam. For each character \omega of H (possibly after enlarging L to contain its values) define the idempotent projector e_\omega = \frac{1}{|H|} \sum_{a \in H} \omega^{-1}(a)\,[a] \in \cO_L[H], which makes sense because |H| is invertible in \cO_L.

Lemma12.1.5
uses 0
Used by 2
Reverse dependency previews
Preview
Definition 12.1.6
Loading preview
Reverse dependency preview content is loaded from the Blueprint HTML cache.
XL∃∀N

Let M be a finitely generated torsion \Lam(\GG)-module. The group H acts on M^{(\omega)} := e_\omega M through the character \omega, and there is a decomposition of \Lam(\GG)-modules M = \bigoplus_{\omega \in H^\wedge} M^{(\omega)}. Moreover each M^{(\omega)} is a finitely generated torsion \Lam-module.

Proof for Lemma 12.1.5
uses 0

Since |H| is a unit in \cO_L, the idempotents e_\omega are orthogonal and sum to 1 in \cO_L[H], so they decompose any \cO_L[H]-module into its \omega-isotypic pieces; this is just the semisimplicity of the group algebra of a prime-to-p group over a ring in which its order is invertible. The decomposition is \Lam(\GG)-linear because the e_\omega are central. Each summand is cut out by an idempotent from a finitely generated torsion module, so is itself finitely generated and torsion over \Lam.

Definition12.1.6
Statement uses 2
Statement dependency previews
Preview
Definition 12.1.4
Loading preview
Statement dependency preview content is loaded from the Blueprint HTML cache.
used by 1XL∃∀N

With \GG = H \times \Gamma' as above and M a finitely generated torsion \Lam(\GG)-module, the characteristic ideal of M is \Ch_{\Lam(\GG)}(M) := \bigoplus_{\omega \in H^\wedge} \Ch_{\Lam}\big(M^{(\omega)}\big) \subseteq \Lam(\GG), using the isotypic decomposition Lemma 12.1.5 and the characteristic ideal Definition 12.1.4 of each \Lam-component.

Lemma12.1.7
uses 1used by 0XL∃∀N

The characteristic ideal is multiplicative in short exact sequences: if 0 \to M' \to M \to M'' \to 0 is an exact sequence of finitely generated torsion \Lam(\GG)-modules, then \Ch_{\Lam(\GG)}(M) = \Ch_{\Lam(\GG)}(M')\cdot \Ch_{\Lam(\GG)}(M''). This uses Definition 12.1.6.

Proof for Lemma 12.1.7

Reduce to the case of \Lam-modules via the isotypic decomposition Lemma 12.1.5, which is exact. For \Lam-modules one localises at each height-one prime \mathfrak{q}: the localisation \Lam_\mathfrak{q} is a discrete valuation ring, and over a DVR length is additive in short exact sequences. Hence the \mathfrak{q}-adic exponent of the characteristic ideal — the length of M_\mathfrak{q} — is the sum of those of M' and M'', which is exactly multiplicativity of the ideals.